Blog > Infographics > The Big Business Side of Healthcare Reform

The Big Business Side of Healthcare Reform

View Comments
Share


The Big Business Side of Healthcare Reform

President Obama’s recently signed healthcare legislation has the many benefits of extending healthcare to over 30 million uninsured Americans while reducing the national deficit over the next decade. However, there are a number of immediate costs to large corporations with thousands of insured employees.

What Big Businesses Say About New Healthcare

  • Medical Companies Speak Out

Medical device manufacturers have warned that a new tax on companies producing medical instruments and equipment will mean that jobs and manufacturing may have to be shifted out of the U.S. in order to secure the already razor-thin profits.

One example is Zoll- the leading manufacturer of heart defibrillators. The company has 1,650 employees. The cost due to the new bill will be $5-10 million per year.

  • Companies Taking a Hit

3M will have a $90 million income tax charge. Caterpillar will have a $100 million income tax charge. Boeing will have a $150 million income tax charge. Deere & Co. will have a $150 million income tax charge. AK Steel Corp. will have a $150 million income tax charge. Valero Energy will have a $150 million income tax charge. AT&T will have a $1 billion income tax charge.

Pharmacies Should Thrive

The new healthcare law means more prescriptions. And more prescriptions are good for at least four companies: CVS Caremark (CVS), Express Scripts (ESRX), Medco Health Solutions (MHS) and Walgreens (WAG).

Small Business in the USA

Over eight million small businesses with less than 100 employees- 70 percent of that group have fewer than five employees- are “super-small businesses.” Super-small businesses represent 99.7 percent of employers.

Health Bill and Small Businesses

Small businesses—with 50 employees and less—are exempt from coverage provisions.

Bigger Businesses

Businesses with more than 50 employees that do not offer health insurance as a benefit and have at least one of the full-time employees getting a subsidy from the federal government to purchase health insurance on his or her own will have to pay Washington a fee of $2,000 for every full-time worker.

Sectors Who Lobbied on Healthcare Reform in Congress in 2009

Among trade and professional organizations, 745 clients lobbied. Among hospitals, 207 clients lobbied Congress about healthcare reform. Miscellaneous groups sent 166 clients lobbying. From the insurance sector, 105 clients lobbied Congress. In manufacturing, 85 clients lobbied. From the education sector, 72 clients lobbied Congress. From the contractors, consultants and administration sectors, 67 clients lobbied Congress about healthcare reform. From the drug makers’ sector, 66 clients lobbied. From the government 51 clients lobbied on healthcare reform.

Posted by: jameszol     Tags:

related visualeconomic articles

related article
Freeze on Medical Savings Accounts
related article
Healthcare Bill and Special Savings Accounts
  • shawn01
    Hi all,
    I am real encourage with the mentation and don't search like adding anything in it.
    ========================================
    Shawn
    Top Savings Plan
  • It's important to understand that all of these costs ultimately come back around to us as consumers and employees. There is no free lunch in economics. The government likes to hide 'taxes' in such a fashion, but don't be fooled.
  • Kelly Stevens
    Don't be confused by the complaints of large corporations that they must take a tax write off hit as a result of the health reform law. Under the previous administration, in order to get the prescription med bill passed and to encourage corporations to continue to offer their own plan and not dump their employees on the government, Congress and President Bush agreed to not only give corporations a subsidy to be use for their plan but to let the corporations write off from their taxes not only their own contribution to their prescription plan but also write off the amount that the government gave them as a subsidy. Why should they be able to write off money at taxpayer expense, that they didn't spend and the taxpayer gave them? The health reform law corrects this. Since corporations can no longer take this write off and it therefore affects their already stated future profit projections, they had to file this fact so investors know the true picture. This is not an added fee on them or an added amount they have to pay our of pocket, but they simply lose a write off for money they do not spend anyway. The economy will adjust to this and corporations will be no less well off than they were before the previous administration gave them this "gift". The purpose of this gift may have been valid but now that the health reform law changes everything, it is irrelevant and unjustified.
  • More taxes can't help anyone at this point. What about actually sitting down and cutting out fraud, abuse, and waste? This is a much bigger problem than anyone can ever imagine, but it seems like it is only very briefly spoken about. Cutting out unnecessary costs is late to the game and is very important to this health care reform bill coming close to being successful.
blog comments powered by Disqus
JOINBOX
Join thousands of VE readers!
SHAREBOX
Share this page with friends!
Yahoo
Share be a pal and share this would ya?
Healthcare Bill and Special Savings Accounts